Subscribe and stay up-to-date with the latest news and great offers from DEKALB, Asgrow and Deltapine.
Don't miss out on the latest agronomic news.
Local agronomic alerts.Delivered straight to your inbox.
Corn silage is a high-energy forage for dairy cows as well as a low-cost ration for fattening beef cattle. Livestock producers interested in developing an efficient feeding program should know the quantity and quality of forages and grains in the silage as well as the nutrient needs of their livestock.
Energy content, intake potential, and the protein and mineral content make up corn silage quality. Silage pH and lactic acid content are important as they affect fermentation. These factors should be confirmed by a laboratory analysis before rations are blended and balanced. The primary challenge in balancing rations is confirming the analyzed sample represents the ration being fed.
Samples should be analyzed prior to ensiling. While some fractions can change during fermentation, crude protein (CP), and fiber fractions remain stable when good fermentation occurs. Analysis can change when:
Corn silage analysis results can be used to balance rations and to improve future crop management decisions. Five important analyses results are: Acid detergent fiber (ADF), dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), NDF digestibility (NDFD), and crude protein (CP).
For more information on analysis and rations contact your local agronomist, silage nutritionist, or veterinarian.
A carefully monitored feed inventory can help livestock producers control feed costs (one of their largest expenses) and maximize profitability. The feed inventory can be a valuable tool for determining available feed supply, estimating total feed needs for the planned herd size, and adjusting herd numbers or planning feed purchases when prices are favorable. The inventory should be adjusted as needed to account for storage and feeding losses.
Silage storage losses can be high if crops are not harvested at the proper moisture content, facilities are inadequate, the crop is not chopped correctly and packed well, and/or silos are not sealed properly. Dry matter loss during ensiling is an important factor to consider when selecting a storage system.
The capacity of a silo significantly affects dry matter loss during feedout due to the amount of exposed surface area—the smaller the silo, the higher the loss. Average losses of dry matter associated with harvest, storage, and feeding also vary depending on corn silage moisture content (Table 1).
Silage must be fed soon after removal from storage to avoid spoilage due to oxygen exposure. Storage facilities with an exposed silage surface must be sized to match the feeding rate to prevent spoilage. Loose silage is more porous and allows greater air infiltration which increases the rate of aerobic growth. Maintaining a firm face and cleaning up loose silage that has fallen to the floor during feedout will help minimize aerobic losses. Also, when silage feeding is discontinued for a long period, resealing is required to avoid greater storage losses and spoilage problems.
Mycotoxins are toxic substances produced by molds growing on grain or feed. The majority of molds that grow on silage are harmless, but a few species can produce mycotoxins. The most common mycotoxins in silage are aflatoxin, deoxynivalenol (DON or vomitoxin), xearalenon, T-2 toxin, fumonisin, and orchratoxin. Contaminated feed is rarely fatal, but can reduce growth rate, lower feed conversion and reproductive rate, impair disease resistance, and reduce vaccination efficacy.
Proper silage preparation creates conditions where further mold growth and mycotoxin production can be controlled. However, some molds can survive even in extreme conditions and still produce mycotoxins. Toxins that are present prior to ensiling will be present even after proper ensiling.
Mycotoxins can occur both in the field as well as later in storage with potential adverse effects to herd health and production. If mold/mycotoxins are suspected, testing is recommended to confirm the potential levels.
Sourcesources: Garcia, A., Thiex, N., Kalscheur, K., and Tjardes, K. 2003. Interpreting corn silage analysis. Extension Extra 4027. South Dakota State University Extension. http://pubstorage.sdstate.edu/.